Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Helsinki is an agreement that ends the conflict between GAM and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia. This MoU became a joint commitment between two parties which later gave legalization to Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh. This study uses a normative juridical method to see how the position of the MoU Helsinki in the Law on the Government of Aceh. With the normative juridical method, the author sees how the binding power of the MoU Helsinki and how the exclusivity possessed by the Law on the Governing of Aceh. From the results of the study it was found that the MoU Helsinki does not have juridical binding power, and there are some Aceh exclusivities that are obtained through the Law on the Government of Aceh in which these exclusivities are not shared by other regions in Indonesia. Keywords: MoU Helsinki, the law of Government of Aceh, Exclusivity
The existence of the Senate (DPD) can be summed up as a meeting between democratization and regional autonomy. The formation of the Senate (DPD) is of course to support regional interests in national policies to protect the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the formulation of problems described earlier regarding the participation of local political parties in national politics at DPD membership, the objectives of the study include examining the participation of local political parties to participate in national politics in DPD membership. Based on the research object above, this research is normative legal research (legal research). The position and function of the DPD are to bridge the local government to the central government in bringing the interests of the people in the regions. The existence of cadres of local political parties in the Senate (DPD) provides channels for the regions in the national decision-making process related to regional interests. Keyword: Senate, DPD, Political Parties
Indonesian independence is a new era in the formation of the constitution and order of state life. Because it was at this moment of independence that Indonesia first formed its written constitution in a standardized manner and compiled it into a state sheet. The constitution is called the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which has been amended four times to date. The points that become the discussion are regarding the provisions contained in Article 37 regarding the procedure for amending the 1945 Constitution whether it has applied the principles of constitutional democracy because the last amendment of the amendment to the 1945 Constitution from the provisions of Article 37 cannot be implemented anymore. The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze whether the provisions of Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution have applied the principles of constitutional democracy. The research methodology used is normative juridical with a descriptive analysis approach. Based on the results of the research on the amendment procedure of the 1945 Constitution, it adopts a method of change known as "verfassungs-anderung", namely a way of changing the constitution deliberately in the manner specified in the constitution. Then use a system of changes "constitutional reform". With the "formal juridical" pathway and completed as changes by means of "formal amendments", namely changes to the constitution which are made in accordance with the provisions contained in the constitution. So in other words Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution regarding the procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution has inspired the values of democratic principles procedurally but the substance of the provisions of Article 37 of the 1945 Constitution is not fully applied to the principles of constitutional democracy because there are still many provisions in Article 37 regarding the procedures for amending the 1945 Constitution. This still needs to be studied in depth, because of its flexible nature after the changes, but its content is still rigid and difficult to change. Keywords : constitutional, democracy, , constitutional amendment procedure
In the context of developing the Sabang Free Trade Zone and Free Port, it is necessary to revitalize the development of the Balohan Crossing Port of Sabang City. However, based on Article 11 PP Number 69 of 2001 concerning Ports, it is stated that the management of national, international ports and hub ports is left to BUMN, in this case PT. Indonesian Port (Pelindo). Whereas on the other hand, Law No. 32 of 2004 and Law No. 34 of 1999 indicates the transfer of authority from the central government to regional governments, including in terms of port management. The same is true in the context of Aceh's autonomy, based on Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh states that there is a surrender of wider authority to the regions to manage their own household affairs. The problem in this research is how is the authority to operate a port based on positive law in Indonesia? What is the authority for managing regional feeder ports in the context of Aceh's special autonomy? And what are the procedures for the utilization and management of the Balohan crossing port? The method used in this study is a nominative juridical research method. The results of the study showed that the authority to operate the port was technically regulated in Government Regulation No. 61 of 2009 concerning Ports. In the context of Aceh's special autonomy, Law No. 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Government and PP No. 23 of 2015 concerning National Government Authority in Aceh in the context of Aceh's special autonomy, wasn't mentioned in detail regarding port management according to the type of hierarchy, but only mentioned regarding port management (in general) managed by BUMN in which the management is managed with the Aceh Government and / or Regency / City Government. Even though the Act and PP aren't mentioned in detail, the procedures for the utilization and management of the Balohan crossing port can be seen in the Minister of Transportation Decree Number KP. 432 of 2017 concerning the Establishment of a National Port Master Plan. The Ministry of Transportation stated that the Port of Balohan Sabang occupied the PL (Local Feed Port) hierarchy. This means that the Regency / City Government in Prov. Aceh has the authority to manage the Balohan Port in Sabang legally justified and allowed by law.Keywords: authority, management and development, balohan port
Human conflict with wildlife is a complex problem because it isn't only related to human safety but also with the safety of wildlife itself. Conflicts that have occurred have pushed the Government of Aceh, District/City Government and related parties to be more wise in understanding the lives of wild animals so that the handling and prevention measures can be optimized and based on the root of the problem. For this reason, a legal protection is needed in the form of a qanun which is expected to be able to integrate all available resources to protect wildlife in Aceh. The method of implementation in community service is to get involved with the expert team Commission II DPRA in drafting the Qanun of Wildlife Management until finally the qanun was ratified on 27 September 2019 and then promulgated to be Qanun on 29 October 2019. The participation of the authors in the drafting of the draft qanun of wildlife includes part of the process of forming the qanun, including starting from the stages of planning, drafting, and discussion. While the stages of ratification or stipulation, enactment and dissemination are carried out by the DPRA and the Government of Aceh itself in accordance with their respective duties, functions and authorities.
The enactment of Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh has provided a legal basis for Aceh Province to revitalize traditional life in Aceh Province. As an inseparable part of the Aceh Province, Gampong Lamie, Darul Makmur District, Nagan Raya Regency is certainly part of the legal area of the Aceh Qanun No. 9/2008. The implementation of community service activities is carried out by the method of delivering materials directly by displaying materials in the form of Aceh Qanun No. 9 of 2008. Customs settlement of cases in Aceh is recognized by several regional regulations and policies. Article 13 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 state that the settlement of 18 types of disputes/disputes between customs and traditions as referred to above is resolved in stages and law enforcement officers provide an opportunity for disputes/disputes to be resolved first. traditionally in the gampong (village) or other names. In addition, it is also stated in the Joint Decree of the Governor of Aceh, the Head of the Aceh Regional Police, and the Chair of the Aceh Customary Council Number: 189/677/2011, 1054/MAA/XII/2011, B/121/I/2012 concerning the Implementation of Gampong and Mukim Customary Courts. Other Names in Aceh.
